Recently, there has been a growing global backlash against illegal activities and the United Kingdom has now joined in by proposing technology companies such as Facebook Inc. and Twitter Inc are fined and banned if social-media platforms fail to curb these illegal activity.
The U.K government outlined plans for an industry-funded regulator that would police the technology companies’ platforms for harmful content, such as incitement to terrorism and child sexual exploitation as well as violent videos.
The move is part of a push by Prime Minister Theresa May’s government to hold the companies accountable.
The U.K. plan follows steps by countries from Australia to the European Union to increase scrutiny of tech companies that until now have largely avoided any form of industry regulation.
According to Bloomberg, last week, Australia passed legislation that included potential prison sentences of up to three years for executives who fail to remove abhorrent material from their platforms.
In the U.K. too, enforcement powers could go as far as imposing liability on individual company managers. The government laid out the proposals as it opened a 12-week consultation Monday.
European lawmakers are also voting Monday on removal rules for online terrorism content, part of a broader EU effort to make platforms increasingly liable for what their users post.
READ ALSO: Facebook Removes 200 Accounts In Philippines For Misleading Behaviour
The U.K. proposal wasn’t universally welcomed.
The Institute of Economic Affairs, a pro-market research group, labeled the plans “draconian” and more likely to do harm than good by holding back innovation.
Director General of the institute, Mark Littlewood said, giving the government power to dictate what content is appropriate sets a dangerous precedent,
Following the March 15 mosque attacks in Christchurch, New Zealand, that left 50 people dead, Facebook and Alphabet Inc.’s YouTube faced worldwide condemnation for failing to take down quickly a video live-streamed by the alleged gunman.
Damian Collins, a member of the U.K.’s ruling Conservative Party who chairs the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, cited the New Zealand terrorist attack as a reason for introducing regulation.
“A regulator should have the power to investigate how content of that atrocity was shared and why more was not done to stop it sooner,” he said.
The U.K.’s proposed laws will apply to any company that allows users to share or find content or interact with each other online, such as social-media platforms, file-hosting sites, public discussion forums, messaging services and search engines.
Other proposals outlined by the government include a code of practice that could include requirements to minimize the spread of misleading information, and an annual transparency report on harmful content.
Even in the home country of Facebook and Google, opposition has been growing.
After a plethora of congressional hearings, a bill that would have restricted online political advertising lost steam when its Republican sponsor, Arizona Senator John McCain, died.
But Republican Congressman Devin Nunes of California has sued Twitter, while Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, a Democratic presidential candidate, last week complained Facebook has too much power.
Yetunde Adegoke
