According to CNN’s reports, From a globally lauded athlete to convicted killer, Oscar Pistorius’ fall from grace culminated Tuesday with a five-year sentence in the shooting death of his girlfriend.
The sentence was imposed for the charge of culpable homicide, which in South Africa means a person was killed unintentionally, but unlawfully.
He was also given a three-year sentence on a firearms charge, but it was suspended for five years on condition he is not found guilty of another crime where there is negligence involving a firearm during that period.
That count related to an occasion when Pistorius discharged a loaded handgun under a table in a busy restaurant. No one was hurt.
During his trial, the double-amputee sprinter often sobbed at the mention of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp’s name. He insisted that he mistook her for an intruder when he shot her through a toilet door on Valentine’s Day 2013.
But there was very little visible reaction from Pistorius as the sentence was read.
Pistorius’ defense has called for a sentence of house arrest and community service.
Giving her reasoning Tuesday, Judge Thokozile Masipa emphasized that the decision on sentencing would be “mine and mine alone.”
She pointed out that sentencing is not an exact science but relies on an assessment of elements including the nature and seriousness of the crime, the personal circumstances of the accused and the interests of society.
She said she would also take into account the factors in sentencing of retribution, deterrence and rehabilitation.
In any case, she said, “sentencing is about achieving the right balance.”
In her final remarks, Masipa dismissed evidence given by probation officer Annette Vergeer that prison would not be able to accommodate Pistorius’ disability, saying her testimony was outdated and sketchy.
She said Pistorius would not present the prison system with an “insurmountable challenge.”
The judge added that she felt Pistorius’ vulnerability had been overstated in the evidence given and that his excellent coping strategies — shown in his ability to compete with able-bodied atletes — had been overlooked.
He would be able to continue treatment for physical problems and mental health issues while in prison, she said.
In terms of the seriousness of the offense, Masipa said Pistorius had shown gross negligence in shooting into a small toilet cubicle, knowing there was someone inside who could not escape. He also knew how to handle firearms, she said, adding that these were “very aggravating” factors.
On the other hand, mitigating factors include that Pistorius is a first offender and remorseful, Masipa said. She also mentioned his contribution to society in giving his time and money to charities and inspiring others with disabilities to believe they could succeed.
Masipa indicated that whatever sentence she handed down would not be impacted by Pistorius’ fame.
“It would be a sad day for this country if the impression was to be created that there was one law for the poor and disadvantaged and another for the rich and famous,” she said.
The judge also highlighted the loss suffered by Steenkamp’s family, which has had a negative impact on her father’s health.
Steenkamp was young, vivacious and full of life at the time of her death, she said.
“The loss of life cannot be reversed. Nothing I say or do today can reverse what happened,” she said.
